WaterRower vs. Concept2: Complete Comparison Guide 2025

When comparing the WaterRower and the Concept2 RowErg, there are several key differences and similarities to consider.

An image collage showing a woman rowing on a Concept2 and a WaterRower tank
Erg battle: WaterRower vs. Concept2 — what's your pick?

Quick Take: Key Differences

  • WaterRower: Aesthetically pleasing, quieter, water resistance, better for home use
  • Concept2: Industry standard, better metrics, air resistance, preferred by athletes
For starters, all of the WaterRower's offerings across their wooden and metallic lines (including monorail models) use—you guessed it—water resistance. The Concept2 options (including the RowErg and the Dynamic) use air resistance. This has a series of implications that we'll get into in greater detail below.

The two competitors also have very different approaches to design from a stylistic perspective: The WaterRower is clearly targeting the in-home workout demographic (as are their key partners at Ergatta), which is why there is an emphasis on aesthetics and noise reduction; Concept2 is less concerned with appearance and more with pure function, although from the standpoint of basic design principles, the very simplicity of the Concept2's structure (as well as practicality in terms of mobility, lightness, durability, etc.) can be equally pleasing.

Let's take a closer look. Document

Table of Contents:

Design Comparison

WaterRower Design

As mentioned above, the WaterRower uses a unique water flywheel system to create resistance, and features a options that have various wooden frames that are made to look good in a living room setting. And they do a great job—just look how well it fits into this mid-century modern space in the below marketing image from Ergatta.

Image via Ergatta/Facebook

However, while it may seem immediately like the better fit for the in-home experience (and aesthetic), there are some important considerations tied to those design decisions.

Real rowing 'feel'

In my experience as both a rower and instructor, the water resistance provides an interesting paradox. While beginners often find it more intuitive, it doesn't perfectly replicate on-water rowing. The resistance remains fairly constant throughout the stroke, which is actually different from what you experience in a boat. When rowing on water, the boat's acceleration causes the handle to feel lighter through the back half of the stroke cycle—something better replicated by air resistance machines. 

Adjusting the drag

Water tank as resistance also means that your only way of adjusting the drag is by adding or siphoning off water from the container, which is obviously more cumbersome than just adjusting the damper setting (the amount of air being allowed into the flywheel) on a Concept2.

Rail Design Considerations

The dual rail design on the standard WaterRower model (and the Ergatta) creates some limitations. The footplate must sit between the rails, which restricts its width and can feel cramped for some users. This isn't an issue with their A1 model or the CityRow partnership machines, which use a monorail design with footplates on either side—a design I've found to be superior overall.

The footplate height on standard double rail models also sits higher relative to the seat than on monorail versions or the Concept2, which can impact the overall feel of the stroke.

Storage and Sound

The water tank's weight (bringing the total to about 103 pounds when filled) actually provides an advantage for vertical storage, creating a very stable base. As for sound, the WaterRower excels here—it's remarkably quiet, and the water movement creates a pleasant, almost meditative swooshing sound that genuinely reminds me of on-water rowing.

Concept2 Design

The Concept2 RowErg uses a flywheel and damper system, and has a more industrial design made of aluminum and steel. It looks like it means business, and it does. 

I said it in our review of the Concept2 rower, and it's worth repeating here—I've had the same machine (a Model C with a PM2 monitor) for more than 20 years, and it still works great. Concept2s are like the Toyota pickup trucks of rowing machines—they simply last forever. 

Performance and Feel

The air resistance flywheel system does an exceptional job replicating the on-water rowing experience. Just like in actual rowing, you feel a natural acceleration and lightening of the handle through the second half of the drive. This characteristic makes it particularly valuable for competitive rowers training indoors.

Drag System

The Concept2's drag adjustment system is remarkably straightforward—simply adjust the damper on the flywheel's side. The monitor also allows for precise drag factor settings, though it's worth noting that most rowers typically stay within the 105-120 range, regardless of their fitness level.

Monorail Design Benefits

The monorail design places the footplates on either side of the rail, positioned lower relative to the seat compared to the standard WaterRower. This creates a more comfortable drive mechanic and better leverag—more closely matching the experience of rowing on water, where footplates sit in shallow cutouts below the deck level.

Storage and Sound Considerations

While the Concept2 can be stored vertically, its lighter weight (57 pounds) makes it somewhat less stable in this position compared to the WaterRower. However, it can be easily separated into two pieces if stability is a concern.

The machine's noise level is notably higher than the WaterRower's. While the sound of multiple Concept2 flywheels might bring back fond memories for former collegiate rowers, it's not particularly apartment-friendly.

Size and Weight

The standard wooden WaterRower is heavier but more compact than the Concept2 RowErg. Some key comparisons:

WaterRower

  • Length: 82 inches
  • Weight: 103 lbs (filled)
  • Vertical storage footprint: Very stable due to weight
  • Storage height: 82 inches vertical
  • Maximum user weight: 700 lbs

Concept2

  • Length: 96 inches (14 inches longer than WaterRower)
  • Weight: 57 lbs
  • Can split into two pieces
  • Storage height: 96 inches vertical
  • Maximum user weight: 500 lbs

For context, both machines offer higher weight limits than many competitors—the Hydrow, for instance, has a 375-pound limit despite weighing over 140 pounds itself.

User Experience

Monitor and Metrics

The contrast between monitoring systems is perhaps the most significant difference between these machines. The WaterRower's monitor is notably basic, offering some unusual metrics (like mph instead of split per 500m) and presenting them in a way that reminds me of an old-school clock radio.

Having used both extensively, I can confirm that the WaterRower's split times read significantly faster than the Concept2's—a 1:35 split on a Concept2 might register in the 1:20s on a WaterRower. This calibration difference is important to note, especially if you're interested in comparing your times with other rowers or tracking progress accurately, since Concept2 is the system used for all official indoor rowing records, and racing through World Rowing.

The Concept2's PM5 monitor offers:
  • Industry-standard split times
  • Extensive workout data
  • Third-party app compatibility
  • Global comparison capability
  • Official competition standards
  • Comprehensive training options

Connected Features

While Concept2 works with various third-party apps and includes a device holder for entertainment, WaterRower has partnered with both Ergatta and CityRow to offer distinct connected experiences with advanced touchscreen monitors. These partnerships add another dimension to the user experience, though they come at an additional cost.

To learn more about the Ergatta experience, read our in-depth Ergatta review.  

Price and Value Analysis

WaterRower

  • Base model: $1,160
  • A1 model: $999
  • Premium for aesthetics
  • Additional cost for connected features (Ergatta/CityRow)
  • Quality materials and construction
  • Excellent for home use

Concept2

  • Base price: $990
  • Minimal maintenance costs
  • Excellent resale value
  • Industry standard for competition
  • Exceptional durability
  • Easy self-maintenance
  • Readily available spare parts

From a pure value perspective, it's hard to beat the Concept2 RowErg. Its combination of durability, lower price point, and status as the industry standard makes it extraordinarily cost-effective. The ability to easily order spare parts and perform maintenance yourself adds to its long-term value proposition.

Detailed Pros and Cons

WaterRower Pros

  • Smooth and quiet rowing experience via belt drive (nylon strap) and water resistance
  • Elegant and sleek design perfect for home settings
  • Easy to store with minimal footprint
  • Intuitive resistance feel for beginners
  • Pleasant water sound
  • Higher weight capacity
  • More stable in vertical storage

WaterRower Cons

  • More expensive than Concept2
  • Limited metrics and training options with standard monitor
  • Narrow footplate and higher seat position on standard dual rail model
  • Narrow, straight handle without ergonomic shaping
  • Complicated resistance adjustment
  • Split times don't match industry standard

Concept2 Pros

  • Comprehensive metrics and data through PM5 monitor
  • Wide third-party app compatibility
  • Exceptional durability and reliability
  • Ergonomic handle design
  • Industry standard for competition
  • Better price point
  • Excellent resale value
  • Easy maintenance
  • More accurate rowing feel
  • Simple resistance adjustment

Concept2 Cons

  • Larger footprint than WaterRower
  • Noisier operation
  • Industrial aesthetic
  • Less stable in vertical storage
  • Lower weight capacity

Which Should You Choose?

Choose WaterRower If:

  • Aesthetics are a priority in your home gym
  • You need quieter operation
  • Storage space is limited
  • Budget isn't your primary concern
  • You prefer the water resistance feel
  • You want the most stable vertical storage

Choose Concept2 If:

  • Performance tracking is crucial
  • You want global comparison capability
  • Durability is top priority
  • You're looking for best value
  • You want industry-standard metrics
  • You prefer easier maintenance
  • You want better resale value

Special Mention: WaterRower A1

The A1 model deserves special attention as potentially the best of both worlds. Based on my extensive experience using it as an indoor rowing instructor, it offers several advantages:

  • More comfortable monorail design
  • Lower price point (just under $1,000)
  • 98 pounds filled weight
  • Better overall construction

However, it does have limitations:

  • Lower weight capacity (300 pounds)
  • Basic monitor system
  • Still doesn't match Concept2's performance tracking

Frequently Asked Questions

Which rower is quieter?

The WaterRower is significantly quieter, producing a gentle water sound compared to the Concept2's louder air resistance whoosh.

Which has better resale value?

Concept2 typically holds value better due to its universal acceptance and durability.

Can I use both for CrossFit workouts?

Yes, though Concept2 was (up until 2024) the official CrossFit Games standard and provides more accurate performance metrics. 

Which is better for beginners?

Both are suitable, but WaterRower's resistance system is often more intuitive for newcomers.

Do I need to maintain water levels in a WaterRower?

Yes, occasional topping up and water purification tablet addition is required.

How often does each machine need maintenance?

  • Concept2: Basic chain maintenance every few months
  • WaterRower: Water level checks and purification tablets as needed

Can I compare my times between machines?

Not directly—WaterRower split times read significantly faster than Concept2 times for the same effort level.

Final Verdict

After extensive experience with both machines, I recommend:

  • Concept2 for serious athletes, CrossFitters, or those prioritizing metrics and value
  • WaterRower for home users prioritizing aesthetics and quiet operation, particularly the A1 model for its improved design at a lower price point

Remember: Both are excellent machines with distinct advantages. Your choice should align with your specific needs, space considerations, and training goals. Consider factors like:

  • Available space
  • Noise sensitivity
  • Budget
  • Training goals
  • Aesthetic preferences
  • Maintenance comfort level

Whether you choose the elegant WaterRower or the battle-tested Concept2, both machines can provide an excellent rowing experience—it's just a matter of matching the right machine to your specific situation and needs.

--

Need some inspo for your next rowing machine workout? We've got you covered! Check out the Rowing Machine Workout Generator.

Read our other rowing machine reviews:

More content on how to approach the erg:
-RR

Trending posts this month

"I Row Crew" — Rowing in 'The Social Network'

The Complete Guide to Rowing Machine Benefits: Why Indoor Rowing Is Perfect for (Virtually) Everyone

The 30 Best Rowing Coaches of All Time, Part 3: The Top 10

So, are Naked Rowing Calendars a Thing Now?

Winter Workouts: Why Do Rowers Fear the Erg?